Date: 2014-09-04 01:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] parrot-knight.livejournal.com
Not with you on Newmark, though the practices of some charities as with individuals and other kinds of associations of individuals can leave something to be desired at election time.

Date: 2014-09-04 08:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] philmophlegm.livejournal.com
I don't expect anyone to actually agree with me on most of the things I post. YMMMV. (Your moral mileage may vary.) I absolutely agree with Guido on this though. Charities and pressure groups should be wholly separate, and the latter should not get the tax and other benefits of the former.

Date: 2014-09-04 09:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] parrot-knight.livejournal.com
I don't agree - charities are inevitably involved in advocacy and all that implies.

Date: 2014-09-04 12:34 pm (UTC)
ext_189645: (Default)
From: [identity profile] bunn.livejournal.com
I think inevitably they always will be, because with so many issues, it's only charities that have the expertise to advise and the authority to raise an issue as something that requires legislation. And then there's the whole issue of how else someone who is not particularly rich and wants to raise an important point about a fixable but unsexy and not particularly profitable problem can possibly proceed.

I have to admit though that with some very large rich charities with very broad remits, I feel a tad uneasy. I am not sure that their donors really know what they are up to.
Edited Date: 2014-09-04 12:35 pm (UTC)

Date: 2014-09-04 12:34 pm (UTC)
ext_189645: (Default)
From: [identity profile] bunn.livejournal.com
As you may have noticed, I disagree with you on almost everything, on principle :-p

Profile

philmophlegm: (Default)
philmophlegm

March 2017

S M T W T F S
   1234
56 7891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 4th, 2025 10:20 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios