'Game of Thrones' TV review
Apr. 15th, 2011 10:51 pmI thought some of you might enjoy this New York Times review of the forthcoming TV adaptation of 'A Game of Thrones', especially if you're one of those women only watching it for the sex scenes.
http://tv.nytimes.com/2011/04/15/arts/television/game-of-thrones-begins-sunday-on-hbo-review.html
"The true perversion, though, is the sense you get that all of this illicitness has been tossed in as a little something for the ladies, out of a justifiable fear, perhaps, that no woman alive would watch otherwise..."
http://tv.nytimes.com/2011/04/15/arts/television/game-of-thrones-begins-sunday-on-hbo-review.html
"The true perversion, though, is the sense you get that all of this illicitness has been tossed in as a little something for the ladies, out of a justifiable fear, perhaps, that no woman alive would watch otherwise..."
no subject
Date: 2011-04-16 07:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-16 12:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-16 04:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-16 07:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-16 12:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-16 08:36 am (UTC)Come to think of it, most fanatical Richardians I've met are women too, and given the parallels...
no subject
Date: 2011-04-16 12:12 pm (UTC)Even so, I'm still mildly enraged by the notion that the story is for boys. The review author just has NO idea.