![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
philmophlegmYou don't have to move the mouse cursor or think or anything. Simply, how many times in sixty seconds do you think you could click a mouse button? And for how long do you think you could keep up that speed?
Have a guess at the answer, then go to this website and test youself:
http://www.urban75.com/Mag/java7.html
Admittedly, this only tests you for ten seconds, so you'll have to extrapolate to get a clicks-per-minute rate. I managed 31 clicks in 10 seconds, so that's a 'cpm' of 186.
Now you have your cpm score, think how quickly you would be able to use a combination of keyboard key presses, mouse clicks with all mouse buttons and mouse movements to issue a complicated set of instructions. Oh, and the instructions you have to issue are not learnable since you are playing a game against a human opponent - you will have to be constantly thinking about your opponent's tactics and how to respond. And the game will last for many minutes, not just one. Now how many 'actions' do you think you could realistically hope to achieve in an average sixty second spell?
I mention this because yesterday evening I was reading an article in Edge magazine (this article in fact: http://www.next-gen.biz/features/starcrafts-enduring-legacy-part-one?page=0%2C0) about professional Starcraft players in South Korea. For those who don't know, Starcraft is a ten year old real-time strategy game made by the same company who went on to make World of Warcraft. For a variety of odd reasons, competitive Starcraft is almost the national sport in South Korea (only football is more popular).
The 'actions per minute' rate of professional Starcraft players is around 300. That's five clicks / key presses / decisions every second. Which is astonishing.
The article says that the difference in skill levels between a good amateur and a top professional is wider in Starcraft than in most sports. I think I'd have to agree. On the last page of the article is a link to a video where two top players explain 'apm' and you can see film of just how fast 300 apm is. And don't forget that they are thinking tactically while all this is going on.
Like I said, it's just astonishing.
If the next war is fought with remotely controlled robots, I hope South Korea is on our side...
Have a guess at the answer, then go to this website and test youself:
http://www.urban75.com/Mag/java7.html
Admittedly, this only tests you for ten seconds, so you'll have to extrapolate to get a clicks-per-minute rate. I managed 31 clicks in 10 seconds, so that's a 'cpm' of 186.
Now you have your cpm score, think how quickly you would be able to use a combination of keyboard key presses, mouse clicks with all mouse buttons and mouse movements to issue a complicated set of instructions. Oh, and the instructions you have to issue are not learnable since you are playing a game against a human opponent - you will have to be constantly thinking about your opponent's tactics and how to respond. And the game will last for many minutes, not just one. Now how many 'actions' do you think you could realistically hope to achieve in an average sixty second spell?
I mention this because yesterday evening I was reading an article in Edge magazine (this article in fact: http://www.next-gen.biz/features/starcrafts-enduring-legacy-part-one?page=0%2C0) about professional Starcraft players in South Korea. For those who don't know, Starcraft is a ten year old real-time strategy game made by the same company who went on to make World of Warcraft. For a variety of odd reasons, competitive Starcraft is almost the national sport in South Korea (only football is more popular).
The 'actions per minute' rate of professional Starcraft players is around 300. That's five clicks / key presses / decisions every second. Which is astonishing.
The article says that the difference in skill levels between a good amateur and a top professional is wider in Starcraft than in most sports. I think I'd have to agree. On the last page of the article is a link to a video where two top players explain 'apm' and you can see film of just how fast 300 apm is. And don't forget that they are thinking tactically while all this is going on.
Like I said, it's just astonishing.
If the next war is fought with remotely controlled robots, I hope South Korea is on our side...
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2010-08-02 10:55 am (UTC)But I was seduced by the idea of a test that would only take 10 seconds, then obviously, had to come and tell you that I got 50 clicks into my 10 seconds.
Me the ninjaclicker!
no subject
Date: 2010-08-02 11:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-02 11:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-02 11:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-02 12:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-02 02:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-02 02:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-02 02:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-02 02:54 pm (UTC)Again, what equipment? Any special technique?
no subject
Date: 2010-08-02 03:01 pm (UTC)I have no idea why this is hard, so I can only imagine what people are doing wrong! Er...don't click up and down with a big motion, but hold hand rigid and use minimum force to 'bounce' the button. And focus - imagine you're some sort of vibrating drill pile-driving through the table for 10 seconds.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-02 02:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-02 04:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-02 09:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-02 02:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-02 03:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-02 11:27 am (UTC)Hold the back page, he's just got 47. He's now addicted to it...
no subject
Date: 2010-08-02 03:29 pm (UTC)I shall call you Mr Slowfingers... :-D