[identity profile] gwendally.livejournal.com 2012-08-01 12:14 pm (UTC)(link)
I've had a "humorous" death threat against me, and I went out and bought a gun and spent money on an alarm system and changed my children's address.

A threat against your life is no laughing matter. In my opinion is should be as illegal as identity theft or malicious slander.
ext_189645: (Default)

[identity profile] bunn.livejournal.com 2012-08-01 12:27 pm (UTC)(link)
But are you a celebrity / sportsman getting a death threat from someone who doesn't know you other than the reason for your public fame?

Saying " I hate that footballer, I'm going to cut his feet off" is pretty unpleasant, but I'm not sure it merits the cost of a police process. It seems more a case for some more extra-legal enforcement, such as the deletion of the account that made the threat.

[identity profile] gwendally.livejournal.com 2012-08-01 12:52 pm (UTC)(link)
I think it is inappropriate for the person getting the death threats to be tasked with evaluating the mental health and credibility of the anonymous person who posted the threat.

Just as you don't joke about bombs in airports, you should not joke about murdering people.

Yes, I think it should be against the law.
ext_189645: (Default)

[identity profile] bunn.livejournal.com 2012-08-01 01:07 pm (UTC)(link)
I didn't say that the person receiving the threat should evaluate the state of the sender.

I'm just not convinced it's possible or reasonable for the police to be expected to arrest all nasty but ultimately not very dangerous idiots and take all of them to court to be fined or imprisoned: I think that could divert resources from other areas that are more important.

[identity profile] gwendally.livejournal.com 2012-08-01 02:50 pm (UTC)(link)
Would you agree, though, that if the person giving the threat is known to the person being threatened and also known to be mentally unstable that the police should take the threat seriously?

ext_189645: (Default)

[identity profile] bunn.livejournal.com 2012-08-01 04:00 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, of course. I think I would consider that to be one of the more important things that the police could usefully spend time on, instead of trying to enforce laws on people who say stupid things that they don't really mean, about people they don't know and will never meet.

[identity profile] gwendally.livejournal.com 2012-08-01 04:58 pm (UTC)(link)
So who is in charge of evaluating whether the person making the threat is not a credible threat? Who evaluates whether they are personally known (even though the comment is anonymous) or whether they are in good mental health so *of course* they don't mean it?